The 10 Best Submittable Alternatives for Art Galleries in 2026

Art galleries, artist collectives, and nonprofit visual arts organizations spend thousands of dollars annually on submission platforms—and many are reassessing whether Submittable's feature set and pricing model still fit their needs in 2026.

Submittable is a general-purpose submission management platform designed for grants, literary contests, and creative competitions. While capable, it wasn't purpose-built for the specific workflows galleries need: blind jury scoring, exhibition catalogs, artwork commerce, and artist payment. As alternatives mature, galleries increasingly find better fit, lower cost, and deeper art-industry focus elsewhere.

This guide compares 10 actively maintained platforms across pricing, jury depth, exhibition publishing, commerce, and support for the unique rhythms of visual arts administration.

What to Look For in a Submittable Alternative

Before comparing platforms, consider what matters most for your organization:

Transparent pricing: Per-call costs, per-submission fees, and whether you pay on volume or flat subscriptions
Art-specific jury workflow: Blind scoring, comparative ranking, configurable scoring scales, juror assignment
Exhibition publishing: Can you generate a public catalog, list accepted artists, and showcase artwork online?
Artwork commerce: Built-in sales, commission tracking, and artist payout—or API integrations for payment processors
Migration support: Can you import past submissions, artist data, or jury results from your current platform?
Juror experience: Dashboard-native scoring, bulk actions, and export for decision-making
Support & stability: Active development, responsive support, and transparent roadmap
Custom branding: White-label options for galleries wanting to keep the submission flow on their own domain

The 10 Best Submittable Alternatives for Art Galleries in 2026

1. Crafted Call

Best for: Mid-size and growing galleries; organizations that want integrated exhibitions, commerce, and jury management; nonprofits prioritizing cost transparency.

Pricing: Free tier (1 active call, limited features); $9–69/month per organization + $150–500 per call (depending on features). Submission processing: 2.9% + $0.30 per transaction. No per-submission tokens.

Pros:

Purpose-built for visual art: calls, juries, exhibitions, and artist storefronts live in one system
Blind jury scoring with comparative ranking and customizable rubrics
Direct artwork sales and artist payout (2.9% + $0.30 processing fee)
Free plan lets smaller galleries test before commitment
Full exhibition publishing: public catalog, artist bios, sold/unsold status
No vendor lock-in: export all data at any time
Actively developed; roadmap includes multi-language support and advanced caching

Cons:

Smaller user base than Submittable; less name recognition
Auction/timed-release features less mature than specialty auction platforms
Requires credit card for free tier after 14 days

How it compares to Submittable: Crafted Call costs 60-80% less for mid-size galleries, includes exhibition publishing (Submittable charges extra), and eliminates submission tokens. Submittable has broader integrations and a larger user base; Crafted Call has depth in jury workflow and art commerce.

2. EntryThingy

Best for: Galleries running high-volume one-off calls; cost-conscious organizations indifferent to commerce features.

Pricing: $3 per submission token (bulk discounts available). No monthly fees, no call setup fees. Pay only for submissions received.

Pros:

Simplest pricing model: transparent per-submission cost
No commitment or monthly fees—ideal for seasonal or infrequent calls
Fast setup; minimal configuration required
Clean, functional jury interface
Basic jury scoring and export

Cons:

High cost for large calls (100+ submissions = $300+ per call)
No exhibition publishing or public artist pages
Limited jury features (no blind scoring, no comparative ranking)
No commerce integration; artists paid offline
Minimal customer support; small team
Limited import/export; vendor lock-in on jury data

How it compares to Submittable: EntryThingy's per-submission model is cheaper than Submittable for small calls but expensive at scale. Submittable offers more jury depth and integrations. EntryThingy sacrifices exhibition and commerce features for simplicity.

3. CaFE (CallForEntry)

Best for: Large institutions, museum networks, and galleries valuing design control and integration with existing websites.

Pricing: $225 onboarding; $250 per call; $2.49 per submission token; $120/year renewal; 3.25% processing fee for online payments.

Pros:

Mature platform with 20+ year track record in visual arts
Deep customization: white-label submission forms, custom CSS, embedded widgets
Powerful jury tools: juror scoring, comments, decision tracking
API access for custom integrations
Established ecosystem of galleries, museums, and institutions
Responsive support team
Import from other platforms supported

Cons:

Highest setup and per-call cost in this list ($250–400 per call for typical gallery)
Per-submission tokens make scale unpredictable
No built-in exhibition publishing; requires custom dev work
No direct artist storefront or commission tracking
Limited mobile jury experience compared to newer platforms

How it compares to Submittable: CaFE is more expensive than Submittable but offers superior jury customization and a deeper visual-arts focus. Best for larger budgets and teams comfortable with setup costs.

4. ArtCall.org

Best for: Artist-run galleries, collectives, and nonprofits with limited budgets; organizations wanting community-driven development.

Pricing: Free to use; voluntary donations encourage sustainability. Self-hosted option available (open source).

Pros:

Zero cost; volunteer-supported development
Open-source codebase; full transparency and customization possible
Community-driven; can suggest and vote on features
Self-hosting option eliminates vendor dependency
Fair-trade ethos appeals to artist communities
No vendor lock-in

Cons:

Limited feature set compared to commercial platforms
Sparse documentation; steep learning curve for non-developers
Minimal customer support; community-based help
No jury scoring or exhibition publishing features
No commerce integration
Small user base; limited ecosystem

How it compares to Submittable: ArtCall.org sacrifices features and polish for cost and transparency. Best for tech-savvy organizations or those willing to contribute to open-source development.

5. ShowSubmit

Best for: Competitive-focused galleries running regional and national juried shows; organizations wanting a showpiece platform.

Pricing: Custom quotes based on submission volume. Typically $2,000–$5,000 per year for mid-size galleries. Per-submission fees vary.

Pros:

Sleek, modern design; high-quality user experience
Sophisticated jury workflow: anonymous scoring, comparative tools, decision mapping
Exhibition publishing with artist searchability
Mobile-optimized for jurors and artists
Professional branding and white-label options
Integration with select payment processors

Cons:

High cost ($2,000+ annually); best suited for well-funded organizations
Limited transparency on pricing until you contact sales
Smaller user base; less community and resource documentation
No direct artist storefront; payout requires third-party processor

How it compares to Submittable: ShowSubmit targets premium market positioning and charges accordingly. Better jury UX than Submittable but less flexible pricing and fewer integrations.

6. ZAPPlication

Best for: Organizations running multiple regional calls; networks of galleries and institutions.

Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing. Tiered discounts for volume and multi-call contracts.

Pros:

Designed for high-volume, multi-location deployments
Bulk juror management and cross-location workflows
Advanced reporting and analytics
Dedicated account management for enterprise users
Integration with institutional systems (CRMs, HR platforms)
Strong security and compliance features (FERPA, GDPR)

Cons:

Enterprise pricing out of reach for independent galleries ($5,000+/year minimum)
Long sales cycle; requires demos and contracts
Steep learning curve for single-location users
No public exhibition catalog
Not designed for small, one-off calls

How it compares to Submittable: ZAPPlication targets enterprise needs; Submittable is more accessible to mid-market. ZAPPlication excels in scale and integration; Submittable has broader feature coverage for single-call scenarios.

7. Artwork Archive

Best for: Artist-focused galleries tracking inventory, provenance, and sales history across all artists.

Pricing: $20–$60/month per artist. Galleries can add multiple artists to one account.

Pros:

Designed for fine art: tracks provenance, condition, exhibition history, insurance value
Inventory management across multiple artists
Sales tracking and commission calculations
Exhibition history and publication records
Mobile app for studio and gallery use
Integrations with Shopify, Square, and other commerce platforms

Cons:

Not a call/submission platform; no jury workflow
Per-artist pricing makes it expensive for large group shows
Learning curve for non-artists unfamiliar with provenance tracking
Overkill for galleries only running calls (not ongoing inventory)

How it compares to Submittable: Artwork Archive is complementary to submission platforms, not a replacement. Use Artwork Archive alongside Submittable or Crafted Call if you need inventory and provenance tracking.

8. Slideroom

Best for: Photography contests, portfolio submissions, and programs accepting video/multimedia work.

Pricing: Variable based on submission volume and features. Approximately $2–$5 per submission. Institutional accounts from $1,500+/year.

Pros:

Optimized for image and video submissions (superior to Submittable for photography)
Powerful portfolio review interface; easy to compare side-by-side
Jury comments and collaborative decision tools
Institutional support for university art programs
Integration with major art schools and MFA programs

Cons:

Premium pricing for high-volume calls
Limited exhibition publishing or public-facing features
No artist storefront or commerce
Primarily a jury/review tool; weak in call marketing and artist communication
Minimal artist documentation support (artist statements, bios)

How it compares to Submittable: Slideroom excels at jury review UX; Submittable is better for end-to-end call management (marketing, artist data, decision communication).

9. Online Juried Shows (OJS)

Best for: Virtual galleries, online-only shows, and organizations wanting to minimize platform overhead.

Pricing: Free core platform. Premium features (artist messaging, juror tools) from $5–$25/month.

Pros:

Minimal cost; freemium model reduces barriers to entry
Built-in exhibition site (no separate website needed)
Juror dashboard included in premium tier
Community-driven feature development
Open-source options available

Cons:

Smaller user base; limited ecosystem and third-party apps
Free tier lacks jury scoring; premium tier still limited
No commerce or artist payout
Exhibition publishing limited to basic gallery view
Minimal customer support; community forums only

How it compares to Submittable: OJS is best for small, volunteer-run galleries wanting to minimize cost. Submittable and Crafted Call offer deeper features and professional support.

10. Dapple

Best for: Fast-growing galleries wanting all-in-one management (CRM, marketing, events, submissions) in a single platform.

Pricing: $299–$799/month (subscription tier varies by features). Free trial available.

Pros:

Integrated platform: calls, CRM, email marketing, event management, exhibitions all in one
No per-submission tokens; flat monthly fee encourages volume
Artist relationship management (track previous submissions, communications, sales)
Built-in email campaigns and artist targeting
Exhibition publishing with artist directories
Dashboard analytics and reporting

Cons:

Highest monthly cost ($299–$799) for feature-full tier
Overkill for galleries only running calls (excess features increase complexity)
Jury scoring less sophisticated than specialty platforms
Requires staff training on full platform
Steep learning curve if you only need calls

How it compares to Submittable: Dapple is an all-in-one alternative to a stack of tools (Submittable + Mailchimp + Salesforce). More expensive but eliminates integrations. Submittable is leaner if you only need submissions; Dapple wins if you want unified artist management.

Comparison Table: Submittable Alternatives at a Glance

Platform	Pricing Model	Free Plan?	Blind Jury?	Exhibition Publishing?	Artist Storefront?	Best Volume
Crafted Call	$9–69/mo + per-call	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	50–500/call
EntryThingy	$3/submission	No	No	No	No	<100/call
CaFE	$250/call + $2.49/token	No	Yes	No	No	100–1000/call
ArtCall.org	Free (donations)	Yes	Basic	No	No	Any (nonprofit)
ShowSubmit	Custom ($2k–$5k/yr)	No	Yes	Yes	No	100–1000/call
ZAPPlication	Enterprise ($5k+/yr)	No	Yes	Limited	No	1000+/multi-call
Artwork Archive	$20–60/mo per artist	No	No	Yes	Yes	Inventory focus
Slideroom	$2–5/submission	No	Yes	Limited	No	Photo/video focus
Online Juried Shows	Free–$25/mo	Yes	Limited	Yes	No	Small/volunteer
Dapple	$299–799/mo	14-day trial	Basic	Yes	Limited	200+/call + CRM

How to Choose Your Submittable Alternative

For small galleries (1–2 staff, <200 submissions/year):

Start with Crafted Call's free plan or EntryThingy's pay-per-submission model
Both eliminate monthly overhead; ideal for seasonal or infrequent calls
Migration: no rush; test the platform with one call before bulk import

For mid-size galleries (3–6 staff, 200–500 submissions/year):

Crafted Call or CaFE are sweet spots: known cost, professional jury tools, exhibition publishing
Crafted Call is 40–60% cheaper; CaFE has longer track record and deeper customization
Dapple if you need artist CRM and email alongside submissions

For large institutions (10+ staff, 500–2000+ submissions/year):

ZAPPlication or CaFE for enterprise features and bulk discounts
ShowSubmit if jury UX and branding are priorities
Dapple if unified artist management outweighs submission specialization

For artist-run or volunteer-led organizations:

ArtCall.org (free, open-source) or Online Juried Shows (freemium)
Crafted Call's free tier if you want commercial features without cost

FAQ: Submittable Alternatives for Art Galleries

What is the cheapest Submittable alternative for art galleries?

EntryThingy ($3 per submission) and ArtCall.org (free/donation) are lowest cost for one-off small calls. However, EntryThingy becomes expensive at scale (100 submissions = $300). Crafted Call's free tier is cheapest for ongoing use: no monthly fees, limited to one active call, ideal for galleries running seasonal shows.

Can I migrate from Submittable to a cheaper platform?

Most platforms can import artist names, emails, and submission metadata via CSV. Few can import jury scores or decisions—you'll likely re-enter scoring in the new platform. Crafted Call and CaFE explicitly support Submittable imports. Get a data export from Submittable first (admin settings > data export), then contact the new platform's support team with your schema.

Which Submittable alternative is best for jury review?

CaFE and Slideroom have the most sophisticated jury interfaces: blind scoring, comparative ranking, juror comments, and decision mapping. Crafted Call offers competitive jury features (blind scoring, rubrics) in a cleaner interface. EntryThingy and ShowSubmit have functional jury tools but fewer customization options.

For photography and visual media, Slideroom excels; for traditional visual arts, Crafted Call and CaFE are stronger.

Is there a free alternative to Submittable for art galleries?

ArtCall.org is fully free and open-source but requires technical setup. Online Juried Shows offers a free core tier with limited jury tools. Crafted Call's free plan is the easiest: no setup required, live immediately, one active call with basic jury features. Upgrade when you outgrow it.

Which platform has the best exhibition publishing?

Crafted Call and Dapple build exhibition catalogs natively: searchable artist directories, artwork galleries, sales status, and direct artist storefronts. CaFE and ShowSubmit support exhibition publishing but require more manual configuration. EntryThingy and ArtCall.org have minimal exhibition features.

How do I handle artist payments if a platform doesn't include a storefront?

Most platforms integrate with Stripe, Square, or PayPal. You can build a separate Shopify store and link artists there, or use a marketplace like Artwork Archive (if you need inventory tracking too). Crafted Call and Dapple include payout handling natively, eliminating extra integrations.

What should I prioritize when comparing platforms?

Total cost at your submission volume: Calculate call cost + submission fees for your typical show size
Jury workflow: Does it support blind scoring and your decision process?
Exhibition publishing: Do you need a public catalog and artist pages?
Artist experience: Is the submission form mobile-friendly? Can artists edit after submission?
Support: Can you reach a human? Is there documentation?
Data portability: Can you export everything if you leave?

Conclusion

Submittable remains a capable, widely-used platform—but it no longer dominates the field for art galleries. Specialization has raised the bar: platforms like Crafted Call bundle calls, juries, exhibitions, and commerce at lower cost and with better UX. Organizations paying $3,000–$5,000 annually on Submittable often find a cheaper, more feature-rich alternative within weeks.

The best platform depends on your budget, jury depth, and whether you need exhibition publishing and artist commerce. Start with the comparison table above, test a free plan or trial, and import a single call before committing.

Ready to switch? Explore Crafted Call, compare pricing, or contact sales for a custom demo.

Want more comparisons? See our detailed guides: Submittable vs. Crafted Call, Submittable vs. CaFE, Submittable vs. EntryThingy.

The 10 Best Submittable Alternatives for Art Galleries in 2026

This guide compares 10 actively maintained platforms across pricing, jury depth, exhibition publishing, commerce, and support for the unique rhythms of visual arts administration.

What to Look For in a Submittable Alternative

Before comparing platforms, consider what matters most for your organization:

Transparent pricing: Per-call costs, per-submission fees, and whether you pay on volume or flat subscriptions
Art-specific jury workflow: Blind scoring, comparative ranking, configurable scoring scales, juror assignment
Exhibition publishing: Can you generate a public catalog, list accepted artists, and showcase artwork online?
Artwork commerce: Built-in sales, commission tracking, and artist payout—or API integrations for payment processors
Migration support: Can you import past submissions, artist data, or jury results from your current platform?
Juror experience: Dashboard-native scoring, bulk actions, and export for decision-making
Support & stability: Active development, responsive support, and transparent roadmap
Custom branding: White-label options for galleries wanting to keep the submission flow on their own domain

The 10 Best Submittable Alternatives for Art Galleries in 2026

1. Crafted Call

Best for: Mid-size and growing galleries; organizations that want integrated exhibitions, commerce, and jury management; nonprofits prioritizing cost transparency.

Pros:

Purpose-built for visual art: calls, juries, exhibitions, and artist storefronts live in one system
Blind jury scoring with comparative ranking and customizable rubrics
Direct artwork sales and artist payout (2.9% + $0.30 processing fee)
Free plan lets smaller galleries test before commitment
Full exhibition publishing: public catalog, artist bios, sold/unsold status
No vendor lock-in: export all data at any time
Actively developed; roadmap includes multi-language support and advanced caching

Cons:

Smaller user base than Submittable; less name recognition
Auction/timed-release features less mature than specialty auction platforms
Requires credit card for free tier after 14 days

2. EntryThingy

Best for: Galleries running high-volume one-off calls; cost-conscious organizations indifferent to commerce features.

Pricing: $3 per submission token (bulk discounts available). No monthly fees, no call setup fees. Pay only for submissions received.

Pros:

Simplest pricing model: transparent per-submission cost
No commitment or monthly fees—ideal for seasonal or infrequent calls
Fast setup; minimal configuration required
Clean, functional jury interface
Basic jury scoring and export

Cons:

High cost for large calls (100+ submissions = $300+ per call)
No exhibition publishing or public artist pages
Limited jury features (no blind scoring, no comparative ranking)
No commerce integration; artists paid offline
Minimal customer support; small team
Limited import/export; vendor lock-in on jury data

3. CaFE (CallForEntry)

Best for: Large institutions, museum networks, and galleries valuing design control and integration with existing websites.

Pricing: $225 onboarding; $250 per call; $2.49 per submission token; $120/year renewal; 3.25% processing fee for online payments.

Pros:

Mature platform with 20+ year track record in visual arts
Deep customization: white-label submission forms, custom CSS, embedded widgets
Powerful jury tools: juror scoring, comments, decision tracking
API access for custom integrations
Established ecosystem of galleries, museums, and institutions
Responsive support team
Import from other platforms supported

Cons:

Highest setup and per-call cost in this list ($250–400 per call for typical gallery)
Per-submission tokens make scale unpredictable
No built-in exhibition publishing; requires custom dev work
No direct artist storefront or commission tracking
Limited mobile jury experience compared to newer platforms

4. ArtCall.org

Best for: Artist-run galleries, collectives, and nonprofits with limited budgets; organizations wanting community-driven development.

Pricing: Free to use; voluntary donations encourage sustainability. Self-hosted option available (open source).

Pros:

Zero cost; volunteer-supported development
Open-source codebase; full transparency and customization possible
Community-driven; can suggest and vote on features
Self-hosting option eliminates vendor dependency
Fair-trade ethos appeals to artist communities
No vendor lock-in

Cons:

Limited feature set compared to commercial platforms
Sparse documentation; steep learning curve for non-developers
Minimal customer support; community-based help
No jury scoring or exhibition publishing features
No commerce integration
Small user base; limited ecosystem

How it compares to Submittable: ArtCall.org sacrifices features and polish for cost and transparency. Best for tech-savvy organizations or those willing to contribute to open-source development.

5. ShowSubmit

Best for: Competitive-focused galleries running regional and national juried shows; organizations wanting a showpiece platform.

Pricing: Custom quotes based on submission volume. Typically $2,000–$5,000 per year for mid-size galleries. Per-submission fees vary.

Pros:

Sleek, modern design; high-quality user experience
Sophisticated jury workflow: anonymous scoring, comparative tools, decision mapping
Exhibition publishing with artist searchability
Mobile-optimized for jurors and artists
Professional branding and white-label options
Integration with select payment processors

Cons:

High cost ($2,000+ annually); best suited for well-funded organizations
Limited transparency on pricing until you contact sales
Smaller user base; less community and resource documentation
No direct artist storefront; payout requires third-party processor

How it compares to Submittable: ShowSubmit targets premium market positioning and charges accordingly. Better jury UX than Submittable but less flexible pricing and fewer integrations.

6. ZAPPlication

Best for: Organizations running multiple regional calls; networks of galleries and institutions.

Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing. Tiered discounts for volume and multi-call contracts.

Pros:

Designed for high-volume, multi-location deployments
Bulk juror management and cross-location workflows
Advanced reporting and analytics
Dedicated account management for enterprise users
Integration with institutional systems (CRMs, HR platforms)
Strong security and compliance features (FERPA, GDPR)

Cons:

Enterprise pricing out of reach for independent galleries ($5,000+/year minimum)
Long sales cycle; requires demos and contracts
Steep learning curve for single-location users
No public exhibition catalog
Not designed for small, one-off calls

7. Artwork Archive

Best for: Artist-focused galleries tracking inventory, provenance, and sales history across all artists.

Pricing: $20–$60/month per artist. Galleries can add multiple artists to one account.

Pros:

Designed for fine art: tracks provenance, condition, exhibition history, insurance value
Inventory management across multiple artists
Sales tracking and commission calculations
Exhibition history and publication records
Mobile app for studio and gallery use
Integrations with Shopify, Square, and other commerce platforms

Cons:

Not a call/submission platform; no jury workflow
Per-artist pricing makes it expensive for large group shows
Learning curve for non-artists unfamiliar with provenance tracking
Overkill for galleries only running calls (not ongoing inventory)

8. Slideroom

Best for: Photography contests, portfolio submissions, and programs accepting video/multimedia work.

Pricing: Variable based on submission volume and features. Approximately $2–$5 per submission. Institutional accounts from $1,500+/year.

Pros:

Optimized for image and video submissions (superior to Submittable for photography)
Powerful portfolio review interface; easy to compare side-by-side
Jury comments and collaborative decision tools
Institutional support for university art programs
Integration with major art schools and MFA programs

Cons:

Premium pricing for high-volume calls
Limited exhibition publishing or public-facing features
No artist storefront or commerce
Primarily a jury/review tool; weak in call marketing and artist communication
Minimal artist documentation support (artist statements, bios)

How it compares to Submittable: Slideroom excels at jury review UX; Submittable is better for end-to-end call management (marketing, artist data, decision communication).

9. Online Juried Shows (OJS)

Best for: Virtual galleries, online-only shows, and organizations wanting to minimize platform overhead.

Pricing: Free core platform. Premium features (artist messaging, juror tools) from $5–$25/month.

Pros:

Minimal cost; freemium model reduces barriers to entry
Built-in exhibition site (no separate website needed)
Juror dashboard included in premium tier
Community-driven feature development
Open-source options available

Cons:

Smaller user base; limited ecosystem and third-party apps
Free tier lacks jury scoring; premium tier still limited
No commerce or artist payout
Exhibition publishing limited to basic gallery view
Minimal customer support; community forums only

How it compares to Submittable: OJS is best for small, volunteer-run galleries wanting to minimize cost. Submittable and Crafted Call offer deeper features and professional support.

10. Dapple

Best for: Fast-growing galleries wanting all-in-one management (CRM, marketing, events, submissions) in a single platform.

Pricing: $299–$799/month (subscription tier varies by features). Free trial available.

Pros:

Integrated platform: calls, CRM, email marketing, event management, exhibitions all in one
No per-submission tokens; flat monthly fee encourages volume
Artist relationship management (track previous submissions, communications, sales)
Built-in email campaigns and artist targeting
Exhibition publishing with artist directories
Dashboard analytics and reporting

Cons:

Highest monthly cost ($299–$799) for feature-full tier
Overkill for galleries only running calls (excess features increase complexity)
Jury scoring less sophisticated than specialty platforms
Requires staff training on full platform
Steep learning curve if you only need calls

Comparison Table: Submittable Alternatives at a Glance

Platform	Pricing Model	Free Plan?	Blind Jury?	Exhibition Publishing?	Artist Storefront?	Best Volume
Crafted Call	$9–69/mo + per-call	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	50–500/call
EntryThingy	$3/submission	No	No	No	No	<100/call
CaFE	$250/call + $2.49/token	No	Yes	No	No	100–1000/call
ArtCall.org	Free (donations)	Yes	Basic	No	No	Any (nonprofit)
ShowSubmit	Custom ($2k–$5k/yr)	No	Yes	Yes	No	100–1000/call
ZAPPlication	Enterprise ($5k+/yr)	No	Yes	Limited	No	1000+/multi-call
Artwork Archive	$20–60/mo per artist	No	No	Yes	Yes	Inventory focus
Slideroom	$2–5/submission	No	Yes	Limited	No	Photo/video focus
Online Juried Shows	Free–$25/mo	Yes	Limited	Yes	No	Small/volunteer
Dapple	$299–799/mo	14-day trial	Basic	Yes	Limited	200+/call + CRM

How to Choose Your Submittable Alternative

For small galleries (1–2 staff, <200 submissions/year):

Start with Crafted Call's free plan or EntryThingy's pay-per-submission model
Both eliminate monthly overhead; ideal for seasonal or infrequent calls
Migration: no rush; test the platform with one call before bulk import

For mid-size galleries (3–6 staff, 200–500 submissions/year):

Crafted Call or CaFE are sweet spots: known cost, professional jury tools, exhibition publishing
Crafted Call is 40–60% cheaper; CaFE has longer track record and deeper customization
Dapple if you need artist CRM and email alongside submissions

For large institutions (10+ staff, 500–2000+ submissions/year):

ZAPPlication or CaFE for enterprise features and bulk discounts
ShowSubmit if jury UX and branding are priorities
Dapple if unified artist management outweighs submission specialization

For artist-run or volunteer-led organizations:

ArtCall.org (free, open-source) or Online Juried Shows (freemium)
Crafted Call's free tier if you want commercial features without cost

FAQ: Submittable Alternatives for Art Galleries

What is the cheapest Submittable alternative for art galleries?

Can I migrate from Submittable to a cheaper platform?

Which Submittable alternative is best for jury review?

For photography and visual media, Slideroom excels; for traditional visual arts, Crafted Call and CaFE are stronger.

Is there a free alternative to Submittable for art galleries?

Which platform has the best exhibition publishing?

How do I handle artist payments if a platform doesn't include a storefront?

What should I prioritize when comparing platforms?

Total cost at your submission volume: Calculate call cost + submission fees for your typical show size
Jury workflow: Does it support blind scoring and your decision process?
Exhibition publishing: Do you need a public catalog and artist pages?
Artist experience: Is the submission form mobile-friendly? Can artists edit after submission?
Support: Can you reach a human? Is there documentation?
Data portability: Can you export everything if you leave?

Conclusion

Ready to switch? Explore Crafted Call, compare pricing, or contact sales for a custom demo.

Want more comparisons? See our detailed guides: Submittable vs. Crafted Call, Submittable vs. CaFE, Submittable vs. EntryThingy.